Skip to content

Question

What does Marcus Aurelius mean by saying everything is opinion?

A look at Meditations 12.22 and what Marcus Aurelius means when he says your judgments, not events, are what disturb you.

Updated

The short answer

Marcus Aurelius means that the distress you feel about events is not built into the events themselves but added by your judgment about them, and that judgment is up to you to revise. He is not claiming reality is subjective or that facts are optional. He is claiming that value and disturbance come from opinion, not from the bare occurrence, so removing a false or exaggerated opinion removes the disturbance while leaving the fact untouched.

Key points

  • Meditations 12.22 says everything is opinion and opinion is in your power.
  • Marcus compares dropping a false opinion to a ship rounding a dangerous promontory into calm water.
  • The claim is not that facts are optional but that the badness of an event is added by judgment, not built into the event.
  • Meditations 2.11 backs this up: things like death, pain, honor and dishonor happen equally to good and bad people, so they cannot themselves be good or evil.
  • Taking this seriously means separating what happened from the story you are telling about it, and examining the story first.

The longer answer

Marcus is not claiming that facts are optional or that reality bends to what you think. He is making a narrower and more useful claim: the disturbance you feel about a fact is not built into the fact itself. It is added by a judgment you make about it, and that judgment is something you have power over.

The line comes near the end of his private notebook. He writes: "Consider that everything is opinion, and opinion is in your power" (Meditations 12.22). He then gives an image: take away the opinion, "and like a mariner, who has doubled the promontory, you will find calm, everything stable, and a waveless bay" (Meditations 12.22). A promontory is a dangerous stretch of coastline where currents and wind make the water rough. Once a ship rounds it, the water calms. The rough water is not the sea itself, it is a passing condition. Marcus is saying your judgments work the same way. Round the promontory, drop the added opinion, and what is left is calm, not because the world changed but because your reading of it did.

The common misreading treats this as a claim about perception generally, as if Marcus is telling you that nothing is really true or false, only "your opinion" versus "my opinion." That is not the doctrine. Marcus, like other Stoics, holds that some things really are up to us and some are not. What is not up to us, health, reputation, the actions of other people, even death itself, cannot by itself make your life worse. If external events themselves are neither good nor evil, then the good or evil in your experience of them has to come from somewhere else: your judgment about them. That is what "everything is opinion" is pointing at. It is a claim about where value and disturbance actually originate, not a claim that facts dissolve on inspection.

This matters because it relocates the work. If a setback at work, an insult, or a diagnosis were bad in themselves, there would be nothing to do but suffer or escape them. But if the badness is added by your opinion, then you have a lever. You can examine the opinion: is this actually harming my character, or only my plans? Is this event itself intolerable, or have I told myself a story about it that is intolerable? Marcus is not asking you to pretend the setback did not happen. He is asking you to separate the event from your interpretation of it, and to notice that only the interpretation is yours to revise.

Practically, this looks like a habit you can build. When you catch yourself distressed, pause and ask what judgment you are making, not just what happened. Often the judgment is doing more work than the event itself: this promotion going to someone else does not just disappoint me, it means I am falling behind, it means I am not valued. That second layer is opinion, and it is negotiable in a way the bare fact is not.

The line about the mariner is worth keeping in view here. Rounding the promontory takes skill and steady effort, not a single decision. You do not eliminate the rough water by wishing it away, you steer through the place where opinion and event are still tangled together, and come out into water that was calm the whole time underneath the waves you added.

Primary passages

Consider that everything is opinion, and opinion is in your power. Take away then, when you choose your opinion, and like a mariner, who has doubled the promontory, you will find calm, everything stable, and a waveless bay.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 12.22 Read in context

The core statement of the doctrine, with Marcus's own image for what changes when you drop an added judgment.

But death certainly, and life, honour and dishonour, pain and pleasure, all these things equally happen to good men and bad, being things which make us neither better nor worse. Therefore they are neither good nor evil.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11 Read in context

Shows why Marcus thinks the value of an event cannot lie in the event itself, which is what makes room for opinion to be the source of disturbance.

Important distinctions

Opinion about an event versus the event itself

Marcus is not saying an insult, a diagnosis, or a loss did not happen or does not matter as a fact. He is saying the judgment that it is a disaster, a humiliation, or an unbearable loss is a separate layer, added by you, and that layer is what actually disturbs you. Denying the event is delusion. Examining the judgment is Stoic practice.

Opinion as subjectivism versus opinion as the seat of value

Reading everything is opinion as nothing is really true or false makes the line a claim about knowledge in general. Marcus is making a narrower ethical claim: of the things that are not up to us, none is good or bad in itself, so the good or bad you experience is located in your judgment, which is up to you.

Objections and replies

Isn't this just denial of real harm

If someone is badly wronged or genuinely injured, telling them the harm is only opinion can sound like it minimizes real suffering or excuses the wrongdoer.

Reply

Marcus is not denying that pain, loss, or injustice occur, or that they are dispreferred. His claim in Meditations 2.11 is that such things happen to good and bad people alike, so they cannot be what makes a life good or bad. The target of the opinion he wants you to drop is the added judgment that your character or worth is destroyed by the event, not the event's reality.

Can judgment really be changed at will

Marcus writes as if opinion is simply in your power to take away, but in practice judgments about a painful event can feel automatic and hard to shift, especially under real distress.

Reply

Marcus is describing a practiced skill, not an instant switch. The mariner has to actually sail past the promontory, which takes effort and time. The claim is that the work is possible and worth doing, not that it is effortless.

Practice this in Stoa

Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.

Related questions

Podcast discussions

Concepts

  • The dichotomy of control You will learn why Epictetus draws a hard line between what is up to us and what is not, and why that line is about identity and value, not stress management.
  • Indifferents: what is neither good nor bad Learn why the Stoics called wealth, health, and even death indifferent, and why that word does not mean unimportant.

Works

  • Meditations by Marcus Aurelius A Roman emperor's private notebook of Stoic exercises shows what it looks like to practice philosophy under real pressure, not just write about it.

Sources

  1. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations Primary text, Stoa library