Question
What maxims does Epictetus recommend keeping ready at hand?
A look at the three quotations Epictetus tells his students to hold close, and what they teach about accepting what is not up to us.
Updated
The short answer
Epictetus tells his students to keep three quotations ready at hand: a line from Cleanthes asking Fate to lead him wherever it has fixed his station, a line from Euripides saying he follows Fate cheerfully because whoever yields properly to it is accounted wise, and Socrates' line to Crito that his judges can kill him but cannot hurt him. All three train the same move: accepting what Fate brings while keeping your own judgment, the one thing truly yours, intact.
Key points
- Epictetus names three maxims to keep ready at hand: lines from Cleanthes, Euripides, and Socrates in Plato's Crito.
- The Cleanthes and Euripides lines both describe following Fate, with Euripides adding that resisting only makes you wicked and wretched while Fate still wins.
- The Socrates line shows that his prosecutors could take his life but not harm him, because harm depends on what is truly his own.
- This connects to the opening division of the Handbook, which places opinion, desire, and action in our control and body, property, and reputation outside it.
- Zeus's speech in the Discourses explains why: the faculty of choice is the one thing given to us fully free from hindrance.
- The maxims are not about resignation, they are about relocating the good and bad in your life to what is actually yours.
The longer answer
Epictetus does not ask his students to invent their own slogans. He hands them three, already written by others, and tells them to keep these ready at hand for every occasion (Handbook 53).
The first comes from Cleanthes: "Conduct me, Jove, and you, Oh Destiny, wherever your decrees have fixed my station." The third is Socrates, from Plato's Crito and Apology: "Oh Crito, if it thus pleases the gods, thus let it be. Anytus and Melitus may kill me indeed, but hurt me they cannot."
A common misreading takes these as maxims about resignation, as if Epictetus wanted his students to go limp before whatever happens and call it wisdom. That misses what each line is actually doing. Cleanthes and Euripides both describe following fate, but Euripides makes the alternative explicit: you can resist, and you will still be dragged along, only now as someone wicked and wretched rather than wise. The lines are not about giving up. They describe two ways of meeting the same outcome, one with your character intact and one without it. Fate moves either way. What is up to you is whether you move with it or against it.
The Socrates line does the harder work of showing why this is not mere submission. Anytus and Melitus, his prosecutors, have the power to kill him. They do not have the power to hurt him. This is the same claim Epictetus makes at the start of the Handbook: things in our control are opinion, pursuit, desire, aversion, and our own actions, while body, property, reputation, and command are not in our control (Handbook 1). Socrates' body was never his own to keep safe from Athens. His faculty of choice, his judgments about what is good and bad, was his alone, and no verdict could touch it. That is why he can accept death and still say he has not been harmed. The men who condemned him controlled a fact about his body. They never had access to the part of him that mattered.
Epictetus grounds this same point in a scene he stages with Zeus in the Discourses. Zeus tells Epictetus that he would have made his body and property free from hindrance if that had been possible, but a body bound to earth cannot be immune to externals. What Zeus gives instead is a small portion of himself: the faculty of pursuing and avoiding, of desire and aversion, the faculty of using impressions. Take care of this, Zeus says, and consider it your only possession, and you will never be hindered, never lament, never blame anyone (Discourses I.1). The three maxims in the Handbook are a way of carrying that lesson into the moment when it is hardest to remember.
What changes for someone who actually keeps these maxims at hand is not their circumstances but their target. The person who forgets them measures the day by whether Fate cooperated. The person who remembers them measures the day by whether their judgments, desires, and actions stayed their own, regardless of what Fate did. This is not a trick for feeling calmer. It relocates where you think the good and bad in your life actually live.
A concrete way to use this: before a hard conversation, a diagnosis, or a verdict of any kind, name out loud what part of the outcome is not up to you, and repeat to yourself that whoever yields properly to fate is the one accounted wise. Then ask only whether your own choice, in that moment, was worthy of you.
Primary passages
Conduct me, Jove, and you, Oh Destiny,Wherever your decrees have fixed my station."Cleanthes"I follow cheerfully; and, did I not,Wicked and wretched, I must follow stillWhoever yields properly to Fate, is deemedWise among men, and knows the laws of heaven."Euripides, Frag. 965And this third:"Oh Crito, if it thus pleases the gods, thus let it be. Anytus and Melitus may kill me indeed, but hurt me they cannot.
Epictetus, Handbook 53 Read in context
The three maxims themselves, in the order Epictetus gives them.
Some things are in our control and others not. Things in our control are opinion, pursuit, desire, aversion, and, in a word, whatever are our own actions. Things not in our control are body, property, reputation, command, and, in one word, whatever are not our own actions.
Epictetus, Handbook 1 Read in context
The founding division that explains why Socrates could say his prosecutors could not hurt him.
this body is not yours, but it is clay finely tempered. And since I was not able to do for you what I have mentioned, I have given you a small portion of us, this faculty of pursuing an object and avoiding it, and the faculty of desire and aversion, and, in a word, the faculty of using the appearances of things
Epictetus, Discourses I 1 Read in context
Zeus's speech in the Discourses gives the reasoning behind the maxims in the Handbook.
Important distinctions
Accepting fate versus giving up
Following Fate cheerfully, as Cleanthes and Euripides describe it, is not the same as ceasing to care what happens. Euripides is explicit that the alternative to following cheerfully is not successful resistance, it is following anyway while being wicked and wretched. The outcome does not change. What changes is whether your character stays intact while it happens.
Being killed versus being harmed
Socrates' line to Crito separates two things people usually treat as one. Anytus and Melitus have real power over his body, they can end his life. Epictetus reads this as proof that they have no power over what actually makes a person good or bad: their own judgments and choices. Losing your life is not the same as being harmed, in this sense.
Objections and replies
Isn't this just telling people to accept their suffering
A skeptic could read all three maxims as a polished way of telling the powerless to stop complaining, which is convenient for whoever holds power over them.
The maxims say nothing about how to act toward externals, only about where to locate your own good. Epictetus elsewhere treats externals as things to pursue or avoid with care, using preferred and dispreferred indifferents. The claim is narrower and more specific: your character does not depend on whether you get the externals you pursue.
Can anyone actually say this while facing death
Socrates' calm before his judges looks like an ideal almost no one can reach in the moment, which makes the maxim feel like an unreachable standard rather than usable advice.
Epictetus is candid elsewhere that the sage is rare. The maxims are not a claim that you will feel nothing. They are something to keep ready, a line to return to, so that even a difficult reaction does not carry you into blaming gods or men for what was never in your control to begin with.
Practice this in Stoa
Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.
Related questions
-
What does Epictetus mean by things in our control and not in our control?
A close look at the opening line of the Handbook, where Epictetus draws the line between what is up to us and what is not.
-
What is really in my control according to the Stoics?
A look at Epictetus's opening claim in the Handbook: what actually counts as up to you, and why the answer is narrower than most people think.
-
What is the Stoic teaching of the two handles in Epictetus's Handbook?
A short teaching from Epictetus on choosing how to grasp what happens to you, and why that choice is up to you even when the event is not.
-
How does Epictetus use the metaphor of an actor in a drama to describe our role in life?
A short lesson from the Handbook on why you do not choose your part, only how well you play it.
-
What does Epictetus advise about desire and aversion for beginners?
Epictetus tells the beginner to suspend desire almost entirely and redirect aversion only toward what is truly up to them.
-
Why does Epictetus say to call a dead child or spouse 'returned' rather than 'lost'?
Epictetus reframes loss as a return to correct a false judgment about what was ever yours to keep.
-
How does Epictetus say we should respond when someone insults or wrongs us?
Epictetus argues that a person who insults you is not attacking something of yours, and that this fact should change how you respond.
-
How should a Stoic respond to insults or mockery?
A look at what Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius actually say about being insulted, and why the insult is never the real problem.
Podcast discussions
-
Michael Trombley and Caleb on Emily Wilson's Critique of Epictetus
Michael Trombley and Caleb examine classicist Emily Wilson's three criticisms of Epictetus and test whether they hold up against the Discourses and Handbook.
-
The Stoics vs. Plato: Blank Slate or Innate Ideas
Michael Tremblay and Caleb Ontiveros compare the Stoic view of the mind as a blank slate with Plato's theory of innate knowledge, and what each means for self-knowledge.
-
Caleb Ontiveros on Why Stoic Happiness Must Be Up to Us
Caleb Ontiveros and Michael Tremblay lay out and stress-test the Stoic case that happiness must depend on us, not on the world.
-
Is Christopher Nolan's Odyssey More Stoic Than Homer's?
Caleb Ontiveros reads Christopher Nolan's film adaptation of the Odyssey against Stoic ideas about the gods, agency, duty, and perseverance.
-
Ryan Holiday Runs Rome's Stoic Sites
Ryan Holiday narrates a solo 50-kilometer run past Rome's Stoic landmarks to draw out lessons about voluntary hardship and endurance.
-
Stoic Lessons on Power and Complicity from Roman History
Two hosts tour Roman political history to argue that Stoic virtue demanded active participation in public life, not withdrawal from it.
Related concepts, philosophers and works
Sources
- Epictetus, Discourses I Primary text, Stoa library
- Epictetus, Handbook Primary text, Stoa library